Introduction - 81-83 FI Imperials - Technical Advice

Here are nearly 3 years of email on the 1981-83 Imperial, primarily on fuel injection issues. There are nearly 500 pages of messages here, loosely organized into fuel injection, electrical, chassis, A/C and other categories. The “late 1999” messages are at the end and are not categorized.

Note that these messages use the “outline” feature of Word to identify categories, message subject and date sent as sub-headings - we could use your help to organize this.

All the authors of this document retain all rights of authorship, including this author’s editing and organization. This document is copyrighted and cannot be reproduced, except for personal use without written permission.

Bob Schmitt, January 15, 2000
bsbrbank@pacbell.net


Subject: 81-83 FI Imperials - Technical Advice Introduction

Sent: Wed, 20 May 1998 00:06:31 -0700

From: Bob Schmitt <bsbrbank@pacbell.net

Dick, Carl, Frank, etc. -

I talked to Carl briefly today (about the statewide meet) and think you guys are very close to creating the definitive document - I know about 80% of it has already been posted as messages and Carl probably has the finishing touches.

I suspect the hardest part is to "get your arms around" the topic. I'd like to help, but don't know a things about the cars (and don't own) but strongly suggest you try the "Frequently Asked Questions" style. Heck, most of the posts were written as a reply to a specific question.

You could start off:

What is unique about the FI on the '81 - '83 Imperials?

What are the components of the FI?

How do I troubleshoot a hard-starting condition? etc.

I'm sure you can pick up on this and refine it. One nice thing about questions is that they also lend themselves to an "outline" format and, if you're using Word and never have tried the "outline" feature, it is pretty slick for organizing.

I've got a lot of old messages and could start, but I know there are many more people who could do a better job because they know what they are writing about. Do it! And thanks in advance!

Bob (still working on the Imperial FAQ)

As for volunteering to organize, edit and post all the info on these cars that has been submitted in the year and a half that I have been a member, Tony and I discussed my doing this at one time, but I have not done anything with the assignment, due to a total lack of understanding as to how to proceed, and my belief that others with more computer savvy would be better at it than I, while I can probably make the most significant contribution to the IML by continuing to field technical questions that I have some experience or knowledge about, and let others manage the web site files. As far as I am concerned, the assignment is still unfilled, and definitely would be valuable contribution from whoever was willing to tackle it. Perhaps Tony will have a comment also.

Dick Benjamin

Subject: 81-83 FI Imperials - Technical Advice Introduction

Sent: Tue, 01 Dec 1998 13:47:04 -0800

From: Bob Schmitt <bsbrbank@pacbell.net

Carmine -

Thanks for the FI tips. I've collected all the e-mail on this topic from the last 2 years and sent it to Dick Benjamin so that he can put it into a good order for eventual posting on the web site. Carl Baty also has a wealth of info on this topic and will hopefully help with review and comments.

Bob

Subject: 81-83 Imperial - General Description

From: "Dick Benjamin"

Sent: Sun, 1 Feb 1998 22:23:59 -0800

Walter;

The '81-'83 cars are delightful drivers, with styling and features that rival much newer cars.

The standard engine was a normal 318 (5.2L) with a computer controlled EFI system and combustion control computer, which gave excellent performance and economy, at the expense of difficult maintenance and parts availability if problems do occur, especially with poorly trained mechanics.

If this car has the factory conversion to carburetor, it will be the same in characteristics and serviceability as any other carbureted early 80's Chrysler product. It will still have a computer controlled ignition system, dash board, and mixture control on the carburetor, the same as any other car from that era. It should be no more and no less trouble to maintain.

If the conversion was not done at a dealership with factory supplied parts, you are going to need more information about the car, since the manuals will not cover it. If you'd like to take a look at the fuel system and see if it is a 2 barrel carburetor, and if so what number, and also check the numbers on the computer module on the air cleaner, we can probably tell you if it is the authorized conversion.

Another thing to note is whether or not the fuel MPG readout is functional, and all other dash features seem to work OK. For instance, check the average MPG readout to see if it is reasonable. With a carburetor I would expect the long term average to be about 14 -15 MPG.

If the conversion is not the authorized one, I think you may have trouble passing the smog inspection (I know you would not pass in California) and you will have trouble getting the car serviced unless you have a really savvy mechanic.

Dick Benjamin

Subject: 81-83 Imperial - General Description

From: Eddenbud@aol.com

Sent: Tue, 3 Feb 1998 00:18:27 EST

Dear Grady,

I've owned my '81 for about four years and my '82 FS for about seven months. My '81 has been converted (by the previous owner) to a non-Chrysler carb. setup, a Holley 4-barrel, while my '82 has the original EFI system. So I'm pretty familiar with the contrast between the two systems and peculiarities of the cars.

As Dick Benjamin pointed out, if a car you're considering has been converted, it's best if it's the Chrysler-designed and supplied conversion. This conversion replaced A LOT of parts, including the gas tank, wiring harness, manifold, etc., and it provided reliable performance AND all of the inputs to the computer necessary for proper fuel calculations on the Information Center. Non-Chrysler conversions may not; for example, my '81, with it's non-standard conversion, does not have an input for fuel burn rate, and so always reads 99.9 MPG (I WISH!!!). Despite these shortcomings, the car does run very well.

I feel that the EFI system is very good too, although it can be very difficult to properly diagnose problems, even to the experienced mechanic--You should see the terrified reactions I've gotten from Chrysler mechanics when pulling into the dealership with one of these cars!! Nonetheless, my '82 is generally a pleasure to drive as well.

Whether you choose an EFI or converted model, you MUST get the complete service manual set, including the service manual, engine performance manual, and (if you can find it) service-bulletin manual. These will prove an invaluable source in leading you and/or your mechanic through diagnostic procedures.

Although both of my Imperials have very good reliability records, I would not rely on one as my only source of transport; they're just not as reliable as a brand new modern car, but how could they be? Since they can be finicky and difficult to diagnose, you might be without wheels for a few days while you or your mechanic tries to figure out what the problem is. On the other hand, I've never had a sudden failure of one of these cars. They always give you signs of an impending problem, and if you heed those warnings, you won't be left stranded.

Here are some other things to watch for when car shopping: The '81's (at least early- run '81's) were notorious for the deck lid rotting out as Chrysler did not provide a proper drain hole (this was an early service bulletin), and the lid would rust from the inside out. My '81 did this, and I was able to replace it with a like-new one. On the other hand, my '82 shows no signs at all of such a problem, as the drain hole problem had probably been corrected on the line by that point.

If the car's been converted to carb., look carefully at how the fuel lines have been routed. You could wind up with a fire if the lines are not properly routed and secured.

As per my previous IML letters, the '81 search-tune radio is an atrocity in engineering, and finding anyone who'll actually touch the thing to work on it is about as easy as finding one that actually works! I'd suggest replacing it with a modern stereo if you get a car with one of those, and hang on to the radio for posterity!

The GOOD NEWS is these cars are really a pleasure to drive. I love driving both of mine. They ride super quiet, soft and comfy, yet still handle better than the whales of previous generations. And the styling is contemporary even on today's roads with aerodynamic "bubble" cars everywhere you look. You will draw admiring glances from any car enthusiast you pass, and you'll hear countless words of praise.

Good luck in your search!!

ED F

Subject: 81 Basic Operation of the EFI ASDM & Other Components

Sent: 8/11/97 2:15 PM

From: bondotmec@alphainfo.com

The last few days, Jeff Gaurino, Frank C, Mike Bleznyk, Bob Harris and I have been having an off-line discussion about the operation of an important component of the EFI system. Our jump off point was a very thorough analysis that Jeff did back in June, and sent to me for comment. I was too busy to respond until this weekend, but now I have made a few observations about Jeff's work and bounced them back to him and the rest of the group, and between us we have come up with an analysis that is pretty damn close, we think. I have not been copying you and the IML thus far, because we are still arguing about some items, and because our discussions really are not going to make sense unless one has access to Jeff's schematics (which of course you have posted on the web page) and unless one is an EE or close to it.

Now, though, I think we are ready for prime time. Close enough to put it out to the whole IML, at least those who have an interest in the frailties and foibles of the '81-83 EFI system. I am going to delete some of the detailed circuit analysis from this message, however, you are welcome to a copy of any and all of our discussions, warts and all, if you want to archive it. What I am sending you now is probably still more detailed than most will want, but some members probably will want to see this level of detail, and the others can just let their eyes glaze over.

So, here goes:

Restating Jeff's theory of operation:

The ASDM (AKA ASD) connections:

pin 1 is solid battery voltage when the starter is cranking, is pulled firmly back to 0 when not cranking, (by the starter solenoid).

pin 2 (the output from the ASD) is solid battery voltage when the fuel pumps and EFI system are up and running (ASD makes the decision based on the other 4 inputs)

pin 3 is solid battery voltage when the ignition is on (starting or running)

pin 4 is the control pump drive signal, which varies from battery voltage to zero depending on how much fuel the system is calling for. It will be solid battery voltage during the initial purge cycle (a second or so) and then settle down to some low value depending on what the open loop program calls for in the CCC.

pin 5 is the drive signal to the ignition coil. It will chop from almost 0 to about 6 or 7 volts while the car is running.

NOTE WELL THAT THERE IS NO GROUND CONNECTION WIRE TO THE ASDM, rather it relies on the mounting bolt to the fender, and note also that the circuitry is likely to be quite sensitive, since it involves TTl logic NAND gates connected as latching bistable circuits, thus making Bob Harris' recommendation of a separate ground wire to the reference ground for the CCC a mandatory design fix. Those cars still running without this added ground are asking for starting and mysterious cutting out trouble.

I would suggest at least a #14 wire right to the ground lug on the right rear of the Intake manifold, where most of the EFI system is grounded. The ASD should be isolated from the body ground at its mounting to prevent noise on the body ground from upsetting the circuit.

NORMAL OPERATION OF THE ASD

Upon initial power up, the Ignition comes on, then the Cranking signal. The control pump will not be running since its power source (the power module in the hydraulic support assembly) does not receive power until the ASD says so.

Therefore the pin 4 input to the ASD is held low by the pump windings, and the ASDM is waiting for the crank signal

As soon as that occurs, This pulls in the relay inside the ASD which supplies power to the rest of the EFI system, including the intank fuel pump. The control pump starts to run in the HSA, and its drive signal appears at pin 4 of the ASD.

The pin 5 signal also appears at this time, and if the engine starts, takes over holding up the ASDM in the "ON" state after the cranking signal goes away.

Thus the ASD continues to supply power to the system and we are merrily on our way.

FAILURE TO START :

If the engine does not start, and the cranking persists, the running of the control fuel pump will continue until about 20 seconds elapse, then the ASDM shuts down to avoid hydrostatic (fluid) lock from too much fuel being pumped.

The owner only knows his car isn't starting, he doesn't realize all power has been removed from the EFI system including the fuel pumps. Bye and bye, he gets the hint, and releases the key to the IGN position.

If he goes back to cranking without cycling the switch to off, the car will crank but it won't fire because the whole system is dead. He has to reset the ASDM circuit to normal by turning the key off for an instant, then the whole process can proceed again. If he does this immediately, ASDM shutdown will occur much quicker this time, since the ASDM has a memory which persists for a minute or so and will prevent pumping more than a few seconds the second and subsequent tries. That is why the control fuel pump (the one inside the air cleaner) runs for about 20 seconds the first time you try, then progressively shorter periods down to only a few seconds or until the car starts.

When the car starts, the coil drive signal takes over as detailed above, and the ASD ignores the Crank signal until the next cycle.

If for some reason the car stalls, the coil drive signal goes away and the ASD shuts down immediately. If a noise pulse finds its way into the logic circuit, the same thing will happen. The only way to get the engine running again is to turn the key off and restart.

THIS EXPLAINS THE MYSTERIOUS SHUTTING DOWN OF THE ENGINE DURING NORMAL DRIVING THAT MANY HAVE EXPERIENCED! Add the ground wire and isolate the ASDM box from the fender electrically, as discussed above, to avoid this dangerous possibility.

Subject: 81-83 FI Schematic board layouts and Theory of Operation
Sent: 3/15/97 10:42 PM

From: bondotmec@alphainfo.com (Dick Benjamin)

The project to make available the schematics, board layouts, and tentative theory of operation of the three major components of the 81-83 Imperial Fuel Injection system has reached a major milestone. Tony now has available the information in downloadable format, please contact him for color copies if you need them. Color is required to follow the board layouts since the two sides of the board are shown in contrasting colors. Be warned, they are large, roughly 1.2 Megabytes.

[If you want a copy of these eight GIF files, please e-mail me at XXLTONY@CTS.COM and ask for a copy! - Tony]

The components covered are:

Automatic Shutdown Module (schematic, board layout) Fuel Flowmeter (schematic, board layout)
Power Module: (board layout) ""
Fuel Control Pump Driver (schematic, theory of operation) ""
Power supply (schematic)

This has turned out to be a major advance in knowledge about this system, and much gratitude is due IML member Jeff Guarino, who had the skill, interest, and fortitude to remove the gunk from the boards on his '82 and trace the circuits. IML member Chris Hoffman has taken many hours of his time to convert the hand drawn input from Jeff to a downloadable graphic format and nursemaid the undersigned through getting them to display properly on a PC. (Both Chris and IML meister Tony use MAC's).

We know there are a few typo's and other minor errors in these, do not take them as guaranteed perfect. The EE's in the group who have the time and interest will hopefully study them, as will I, and feed in corrections as discovered. I will be the contact point for this, and will update Tony’s files as needed.

What a group we've got here with the IML, guys - when even the Chrysler Corporation threw up its hands over trying to keep these things on the road, our little seat of the pants operation is going to be the main source of maintenance and repair information in their stead.

Now if we can only find a test set!

Dick Benjamin bondotmec@alphainfo.com

Subject: 81 FI - CCC Electronics Circuit Diagrams

Sent: 2/13/97 9:47 AM

From: jguarino@pangea.ca (jeff guarino)

Hello Dick,

I'm glad you got the diagrams and that you got them in good shape. I've been fairly busy the last week, only now getting time to reply. Your right about the amount of time it took to decipher the circuit boards and put it down on paper but I spread it out over a month or so doing a little every now and then when I felt like it. The hardest part is scraping all of the jelly or whatever you want to call it off the components. At the time (two years ago) I wanted to analyze it future but I shorted out my power supply and a bunch of other more pressing things came up after which I kinda lost interest. Just this year I bought a used FI system for $200 CDN and the car ran fine. I tried substituting back the old parts one at a time and found out none of them were any good. That is all four boards were shot (the CCC, fuel flowmeter, air flowmeter, and ASD). I still don't know what caused the original fault.

You were asking about the 30 ohm resistor in series with the output. Well when I was experimenting around with the board the output would go up to about 60v when I removed that resistor, that is with no load on the output.

I wanted to let you know about a transistor on the power module. I forgot to write it in on the diagram. It's Q37 and it had these numbers on it: o39m 1196, if that means anything to you. Maybe you could write it down on the schematic before you get it scanned? Some of the components on these boards were impossible to read or had no numbers on them at all. So I left those blank with a question mark.

I'm glad to see there is so much interest in these circuits. I did try in vain to get the schematics from Chrysler. I know they're out there somewhere. I would really be interested in getting the CCC schematics and info on how it works.

Jeff Guarino

Subject: 1981 - 1983 Imperial EFI - Web Site Tips?

Sent: 1/17/97 4:04 PM

From: fc3@bellatlantic.net (Frank Cannavale, III) Reply-

Seems like there are a few people out there who are having some problems with the EFI on 80s Imperials. I just added my 1983 Imperial to my web page (see below) and included some pkzipped (everyone should have pkzip) files you can download. The files are GIF format. (Everyone should be able to display GIF files.) Each file is a scan of one page. The filenames are in the format of "PageSS-NNN" where SS is the manual section number and NNN is the page in that section. (That's Chrysler's convention, I did not make up my own, which would be confusing if you wanted to compare with someone else who has a manual.)

BTW, I also stopped by two dealers that sold 81-83 Imperials. Both stated that they still are willing to service them. Maybe some day I'll send mine in, but it is working OK for the little I do with it.

Subject: 81 FI - CCC Electronics Circuit Diagrams

From: bondotmec@alphainfo.com (Dick Benjamin)

The diagrams arrived today in fine shape. Since you made the very considerable effort for use color coding to make them easier to decipher,

I am going to take them in to Kinko's to get them reproduced in color the next time I go into town, which should not be more than a couple of days (I live about 15 miles from civilization). Frank, and anybody else on the line here, Jeff has spent (I would estimate) at least a week carefully tracing out the schematic and board layouts for the 81-83 ASD, Power Module, Fuel Pump Driver and Fuel Flowmeter circuits.

He has color coded to show the printed wiring on both sides of the printed wiring boards, and suggested a theory of operation for most of the circuitry. This, folks, is dedication. Also, one helluva lot of work! MY scanner is only a black and white scanner, but any of you on the IML who would like me to e- mail you scanned images of all Jeff's work, just let me know by e-mail and I will send this all on to you. There are 8 Pages, so the file is BIG!

Any of you who want the color copies, let me know also and I will let you know what it costs to produce a set. I will return the originals to Jeff as soon as I have a good reproducible set. Frank, I assume you want a set of the color copies too, but I will send you the B&W images right away.

Jeff, I have not taken the time to try to analyze the circuits at all, but as I do (and/or if anyone else out there does,) I would like to have a discussion with all parties to see if we can thoroughly understand what is going on with these critters.

From what I can see so far, they don't look too tough. I would comment, Jeff, that the resistor you found burned out in the power module, if I understood you right, was the 30 ohm in series with the 23 volt output, and unless it burned up in such away that it shorted across itself (very unlikely, right?) it would have just interrupted the 23 volts to the other units, which I would not think would damage anything.

Whatever caused the resistor to burn out, however is another story. I hope it was just a bare wire short in the harness somewhere. Did you ever find the cause?

Dick Benjamin bondotmec@alphainfo.com ------

Subject: 81 Imp - General

Sent: 1/20/97 6:27 PM

From: grad@cts.com (Carl F. Baty)

Tony, I wonder if it would be possible for those Imperial owners who are writing about a specific year Imperial could put the year up front in the subject. Something link 81 Torsion Bars, or 76 Radiator Needed. In doing this way it would be possible to find the those messages which are most meaningful to us without having to open each and every submission - and those that have time can still open every submission.

I am having my 81 Imperial Ltd. Edition painted over the next 4 days. Wish me luck in getting the job I am paying for. Nancy Kramer and I both own 81 Imperial Limited Editions. We are going back and forth to find out why these exist and how they are different. Anyone out there have a Limited Edition? Anyone know anything about them. Thanks Carl

Subject: 1980's Imperial diagnosis, continued... O2

Sent: 3/4/97 9:14 PM

From: bondotmec@alphainfo.com (Dick Benjamin)

From: George E.Pearson

What is apparently the O2 sensor wire is thin and black. It exits from the cable bundle where it enters the plug at the front bottom of the engine computer it is a foot or so long and ends with a male bullet connector. What I assume is the O2 sensor is like a spark plug and is on top of the left side of the block toward the rear. It has a short thin black wire with a female bullet connector. I have been trying to get the reading you asked for and have been puzzled because I was now getting 0 volts on cranking at the light green wire. Then found that I also got 0 volts from the battery. One of my test leads was intermittent as if I didn't have enough mysteries! I will have to repeat the measuring of the normal mode when the engine cools off in about 4 hours. The cranking voltages at the light green wire in the no-restart mode with the O2 sensor disconnected aa surge of about 8 Volts and then a steady 1 1/4 volt. With the O2 sensor connected the surge was between 7 and 9 1/2 volts and the more or less steady voltage was between 1 and 2. It varied each time I tried. More later.

Subject: 81 FI Diagnosis, ASD Module problems

Sent: 3/4/97 9:56 AM

From: bondotmec@alphainfo.com (Dick Benjamin)

As you have probably noticed I have been using your schematics to try to solve the mystery as to why George Pearson's car won't restart when it is warm.

I seem to remember a remark you made a month or so ago that you have been running your car with the ASD module bypassed, and the thought suddenly occurred to me that you might have had a related problem. In George's case, the CCC is sending out a shutdown signal to the ASD when the car warms up and he tries to restart it. It would be a simple matter to cut the offending wire (#4 pin on the ASD) and tie it back in the harness, and just ground the pin on the ASD to defeat the shutdown command. I'm wondering if that’s what you did, and if so, what were the circumstances that led you to do it?

Right now, I'm following the fact that his so called mechanic sent him home with his O2 sensor disconnected, and it the thought that it may have become contaminated from lack of feedback controlling the F/A ratio. I'd like to see what effect a new O2 sensor will have on his problem. Did you cover any of this same ground?

Chris Hoffman has scanned your color schematics and is forwarding them to Tony for posting on the IML website. I can't wait to see them out there for everyone to use. It is such a pleasure to have some helpful and interested people to pitch in to help these beautiful cars, even if Chrysler has disowned them!

Dick Benjamin bondotmec@alphainfo.com

Subject: 81 FI Diagnosis, ASD Module problems

From: Jeff

Sent: March 8, 1997 1:09 AM

Hi Dick.

I've finally found the time to sit down and do some serious investigating.

I had the same problem you had in trying to figure out the logic behind the ASD operation. After almost giving up I took another look at the manual. Apparently to prevent hydrostatic engine lock(?) during cranking only, ASD pin#4 receives an input from the power module to shut down (see p 14-95 of manual).

If the control pump is signaled to operate at full speed for more than 10 to 20 seconds shutdown will occur. The control pump should operate at full speed for a second or two to pressurize and flush out vapors (see p 14-86).

By taking another module apart I found out the chip is a 4011 chip. Simply 4 nand gates, which I had already suspected. By testing the circuit I've discovered the following: ASD pin#4 must be grounded before power is applied to the circuit. This ensures pin 12 stays low. The circuit consisting of the two nand gates (pins 8,9,10,11,12,13) and D26 act like a flip flop. If ASD pin #4 is left open pin 12 always jumps high when power is applied disabling the start pin ASD pin#1.

So we've established that ASD pin #4 must be low before power is applied to ASD pin #3 (run). When it's done in this order pin 12 stays low and if ASD pin#1 is now held low the relay comes on. Now leaving ASD pin#1 low and disconnecting ASD pin#4 (to simulate hydrostatic lock) C21 and C31 charge up, taking 15 to 20 seconds and cause pin 12 to go high and the relay shuts off.

Next I disconnected ASD pins #1 and #3 and connected back ASD pin #4. C31 is discharged but C21 still has some voltage across it (8v).

Then I connected back ASD pins #3 and #1 in that order and the relay came on. Now disconnecting ASD pin #4 caused the relay to shut off after only 5 seconds because C31 and C21 charged up faster due to remaining charge on C21. This is exactly what it says should happen in the manual.

So after the engine starts (which I simulated by making pin 5 high), I disconnected the voltage on ASD pin #1 and the relay stayed on. Then I disconnected ASD pin#4 from it's grounded state and nothing happened, the relay stayed on indefinitely.

Actually I've been trying to figure this out on and off for the last couple of years and now I'm extremely pleased that I've figured it out. Let me know if this makes sense to you or have I made more mistakes?

The first ASD that I took apart had what looks like a diode added on as a cure for something. That is Dx between pin 5 and pin 3. This second ASD doesn't have this diode and has only a 100k resistor in place of R15 and Rx.

Also I received a circuit diagram, one I've never seen before from Glen Nettelton. It clearly shows a feedback signal originating from pin 6 of the power module going to the CCC and ASD.

Well I think this is enough for one day, isn't it?

hear from you later, Jeff Guarino

Subject: 82 FS EFI and some Electrical problems - O2

Sent: 6/11/97 12:40 AM

From: HarrisWerks@worldnet.att.net (Robert J.Harris)

I feel like I came in the middle of the movie, but it sounds like your bulkhead disconnect on the firewall is not tight, moisture is getting in and affecting your electrical system. This is neither hard to check nor to fix.

I also tend to think that the oil in the Air Cleaner is from a bad PCV Valve, or the rest of the system is blocked - the hose or port in the base of the Throttle Body. It's not a bad idea to remove the Throttle Body and clean it up with carburetor, (spray), cleaner.

You can also check the Oxygen Sensor circuit in the following manner:

Engine must be warm. Separate the lead coming from the sensor at the rubber connector. With the engine running, hold the male end of the lead in your right index and thumb fingers and rest your left index finger on the battery positive post. The engine idle speed should decrease and if you hold it long enough, the engine will stall. The alternate response is to then switch the left hand fingers to the battery negative post - the idle speed should increase and the engine will run very rich.

If you get no response at all, then the electrical circuit from the connector to the CCC is broken, (open), or the computer is defective. Often the very end of the wire to the CCC at position number 12 on the CCC connector is open due to too much handling, but it can be repaired.

If the CCC responds to both of these tests, but the engine does nothing when the connection to the sensor is replaced, the Oxygen Sensor is defective. When defective or the electrical connection to the CCC is bad, the CCC will default a rich mixture to the fuel system, the engine will smell rich at idle, but the idle speed will become most steady but funniest of all, the gas mileage difference is not measurable!

There are two metal breather ports inside the intake manifold on these engines that deliver the exhaust gases to the incoming air when the EGR valve is open. I would say that these are probably blocked solid if you haven't cleaned them and hence the EGR system is not working even if the valve is working. On the good side, the EGR system only reduces gas mileage and tends to cool the Air/Fuel mixture to the extent that it helps prevent "pinging" on a hot, dry day.

There is another quirk on these cars that many of you might not know about and it is this: The metal-to-hose connection on the AC discharge line near the muffler is very prone to leak. The AC lubricant will drip down onto both of the Field Brush pockets on the rear of the 114 amp alternator and render them useless. The ultimate damage is a highly overcharged battery which will boil and the case will swell and distort. The hose will have to be replaced and the alternator disassembled to clean the slip rings. Good time to replace the brushes.

I believe there were two kinds of wheels available on these cars, two kinds of tires and either leather or Chesterfield cloth interior fabrics. Your choice was at a no-cost basis, the moon roof was an extra cost item.

There is one other item that I wanted to say about the EFI component parts:

Late in the eighties, Chrysler undertook an unprecedented task and refined all of the EFI component parts for this car line, and bear in mind that this happened AFTER production was stopped, long after! All of the tooling, unassembled new parts and returned used parts were gathered along with all of the bits and pieces and transported to a new location and over a year was spent restoring the tooling and test equipment to original specs, and even better.

Then the assemblies were modified to include superior components to avoid early failure and operate the way they were originally intended. The results were vastly improved Power Modules, and Support Plates, to the extent that the bulk of the complaints went away.

To be more up-to-date, Chrysler was ready to rebuild a production run of EFI Combustion Computers just last month, the unavailability of cores was the restraint. This is important because many EFI equipped owners cars will never run right no matter what they do because the parts are inherently defective, right off the line.

New Support Plates are still available and the Computers should be available now.

Despite all this there are still some nagging problems, but I am not afraid to take my Imperial anywhere for an extended trip and there were many years when that was not possible.

As for the Sun EFI tester, I bought one of these from Sun in 1984, new in the box. The price was nowhere near the 1850 to 2000 dollars which was the original price. I called them a few months later to inquire for a friend and they told me that they had taken the last eighty two of these brand new instruments to the dump and bulldozed the dirt over them. On the good side, I can say that use of this tester only helped me on two occasions in diagnosing the problems with the system, all other times it was the way we all are probably trying to get these things running right.

And to boot, the Service Manual Diagnostics are not right.! Knowing all of this, it might be futile to go ahead with the schematics of the various components because either the circuit is different or the components are different - or both.

Lastly, I have come upon an opportunity to acquire many of the little pieces of the EFI components and that includes the Instrument Cluster. I have four pages of part numbers of all the little resistors, capacitors, switches etc., for this system and this may be a great opportunity, my question is would this be a wise investment and are there enough 81-83 EFI owners in need of these pieces. If I don't act soon, I'm afraid another bulldozer will be put to work and that would be sad. I would appreciate some feedback on this item soon.

Thanks to Dick Benjamin for your response.

Bob Harris

Subject: 81 - Dangling tube is an air bleed

Received: 3/1/97 10:52 AM

From: bondotmec@alphainfo.com (Dick Benjamin)

Yeah, the dangling tube is an air bleed, and should be there.

Related to your problem? I don't think so, but let me study some.

Dick

Troubleshooting

Subject: 81 FI warm no start problem

Sent: 2/28/97 10:37 PM

From: bondotmec@alphainfo.com (Dick Benjamin)

I agree it does not sound like it will be a failure of the secondary ignition circuitry. I would still be very interested in the health of the temperature sensors and air plumbing I mentioned.

Would you be able to produce the symptom (non-start condition) and then, loosen the wing nut on the top of the air cleaner, and pour one tablespoon of gasoline down the center screw, retighten the wing nut and immediately try to start the car. If it starts right up for you, which I suspect it will do, we have eliminated a whole bunch of possibilities. If it still will not start, then we have eliminated another large set of problems. Lets try that, and take our next path of diagnosis from what we learn.

We'll find it, don't give up!

Dick

Subject: 81 FI warm no start problem

Sent: 3/1/97 11:11 PM

From: bondotmec@alphainfo.com (Dick Benjamin)

George;

The next thing to check is to look at pin #2 on the ASD (Auto Shut Down Module) when the problem is occurring and see if there is 12 volts on the pin. You will have to jury rig some way to probe it while everything is connected and someone is cranking the starter.

The ASD module is the square thingy mounted with two screws to the right inner fender. It has 5 wires going to it; one is tan, one is black with a yellow tracer, one is dark blue, one is light green, and one is dark green. Only two of them are large wires (#12). The one we are interested in here is the dark green wire. The same wire (other end) goes to the resister mounted on the firewall, toward the top on the right side. It might be easier to get to there. The resistor has another wire to its other end, which is also dark green, but that one has a white tracer on it. I think you are going to find that there is no 12 volts on the pin when the engine is warm and you are trying to start it, but I don't want to jump to any conclusion just yet.

Stay with us here, we are gonna get it!

Dick Benjamin bondotmec@alphainfo.com

Subject: 81 FI warm no start problem

Sent: 3/1/97 10:06 AM

From: bondotmec@alphainfo.com (Dick Benjamin)

OK, George, now we're getting somewhere.

The fact that the car started when you manually introduced fuel leads us to the conclusion that the fuel supply is not turning on when the car is warm. We have eliminated anything to do with ignition (as it appears you already knew from your ignition analyzer).

the air cleaner temp controlled flapper, I guess what you have to do is take the flex duct off the fender air scoop so you can see the flapper valve operate. It should be opening to let the air from the exhaust manifold area into the air cleaner when the car is running cold, and should close off that passage to allow only cool air from the 4 inch flex duct passageway when the underhood air reaches about 100 degrees.

Now, I am wondering if the air flow sensor is the whole cause of your problems with this car. We need to get a test meter on the signal from this air flow sensor and see if it is telling the fuel system to start up and supply fuel when the car is warm. (Once you get the engine running, it is apparently OK, so we seem to have a chicken and egg situation). Another possibility is that the Automatic shutdown module is telling the fuel system to sleep.

Unfortunately my Engine manual is down at my shop and I need to study it some before I can tell you specifically what wire to look at. Since you have an IGN analyzer, can I also assume you have a VOM?

We'll get this critter straightened out, never lose hope!

I'll talk to you more later (this evening)

Dick.

Subject: 81 FI warm no start problem

Sent: 3/2/97 5:37 PM

From: bondotmec@alphainfo.com (Dick Benjamin)

Ah HAH! We're homing in on this one. Not to brag, but that’s two for two as to what we though you would find (the 14 volts is right with the engine running, and it should have had battery voltage while cranking, which would be between 10 and 12 volts). Let me think about this for a while.

the history of the problem as described in the note to your son;

MY GAWD! You must be an extraordinarily patient man. I think you have an excellent small claims case (but I'm no lawyer). At the very least, you should contact the appropriate corporate management and tell them the facts just as you did here, with no emotion or flamethrowing. If I were running the business, I would certainly want to know how my customers were being treated. Damn, they really screwed up a beautiful and valuable car.

We'll fix the FI, just hang in there.

Dick

Subject: 81 FI warm no start problem

Sent: 3/3/97 10:07 AM

From: bondotmec@alphainfo.com (Dick Benjamin)

OK, George, I printed out your results and rearranged the columns. I wish I knew why the E-mail does that to tables.

Anyway, I got most of the info I need. The pin 4 voltage of 1.3 volts in the no-start condition. is probably the root of the problem, unfortunately this lets the ASD off the hook, we've got to look into the CCC and the power module. I would like to know what this voltage is when the car is cranking in the conditions where it will start. I assume its 0 or thereabouts, and I know its hard to do, since the car will start pretty quickie and only give you an instant to notice, but if you could get someone to crank it for you when it cools off so that you know it will restart, it would be nice to know what the normal voltage is here. As I say, anything below about 1/2 volt is OK.

Some time way back when we started this discussion, you told me about a wire you found the dealer had not reconnected. You fixed it, and it did not seem related to the problem, but just for completeness, I'd like to know what color the wire is, and where it comes from/goes. If it came from the O2 sensor, it is probably related to the problem, because the car would have been driven with no power to the O2 sensor, which would probably poison it.

It is out of the picture on a cold start, and would cause the same symptoms as you are seeing, I think. (Not sure about this, anybody else out there ever run one of these puppies any distance without the O2 sensor hooked up?)

Still at it, Dick.

Subject: 81 FI warm no start problem

Sent: 3/4/97 9:57 AM

From: bondotmec@alphainfo.com (Dick Benjamin)

OK, George, I think you've identified the wire correctly. The O2 sensor is actually threaded into the left exhaust manifold/header, it samples the oxygen percentage in the exhaust once the engine is warmed up and it is the main control signal for the CCC. It is a black #18 wire (small wire) with bullet connections to the sensor pigtail. Is this the wire that you found disconnected previously? I mean when the garage screwed your car up in the first case.

If you are out and about today, you might pick up new one (they are only few bucks) and install it. They are easily contaminated and it is possible that your whole problem started here. When you install it, if you see the need to use thread sealer on the threads, be sure that you use sealer that is specifically approved for use with Oxygen sensors.

The # you want is an OS 101 sensor, very common, should be available off the shelf at any parts store. (I use NAPA, a little more expensive parts, but reliable quality).

In another message, which I will CC to you, I am going to ask another guy who is knowledgeable about these critters for a little help here. Stay tuned.

Dick

Subject: 81 FI warm no start problem

Sent: 3/2/97 11:45 PM

From: bondotmec@alphainfo.com (Dick Benjamin)

George,

The next step is to see what is going on with the ASD module. It might be bad, or it might not be seeing the right information from the other devices. One by one, then, on the ASD:

1. Check the voltage on pin 3: (heavy dark blue wire) -- should show 12 (volts more or less) whenever the key is on in either the run or start position.  (This is really a check of your ignition switch, which is not likely to be the culprit, but lets be sure)

2. Check Pin 1: (a smaller tan wire). Should show 12 volts when you are cranking, (a little less because of the load on the battery, but not less than about 10 volts. (This is really a check of the starter relay, which is also an unlikely candidate for blame, but lets be sure.)

3. Check pin 4 (a small light green wire) while you are cranking when the non-start condition is occurring: It should be 0 volts (not more than 1/2 volt max.) and stay there while you crank. Ill bet its not staying down when the car is not starting, but is down when it starts OK.

Lets verify these facts and then take it to the next step. We will know, after these measurement whether its the ASD or something else.

Dick.

Subject: 81 FI warm no start problem

Sent: 3/4/97 9:11 AM

From: bondotmec@alphainfo.com (Dick Benjamin)

George

OK, I understand the "bad test lead" phenomenon, having fought such all my life. I knew it would be a tough measurement for you to make, but it would be good to have the information. I might have misled you in the discussion about the O2 sensor - I did not mean to ask you to make the measurements of voltage on the light green wire with the O2 sensor disconnected - just leave it connected.

Another message follows for you.

Dick

Subject: 81 FI - vacuum sensing information

Sent: 3/5/97 10:39 PM

From: bondotmec@alphainfo.com (Dick Benjamin)

George;

I owe you an apology. You said a dangling vacuum tube that was black with a yellow stripe and I assumed without checking that you were noticing the unused port on the ERG control valve that sits near the left front of the engine. This is the device you mentioned with the part number 4227670 on it. The "unused" connection to the vacuum circuit is indeed an air bleed, and would not have anything to do with our mystery problem. HOWEVER!!! This evening, I got smart and had my wife come out to my 81 with me and point out a black tube with yellow stripe on it...

You were right all along, there is such a tube, and it should be hooked up. It goes into the bottom of the air passageway that is the continuation of the 3" flex duct that pipes air over from the fender air ducting. The purpose of this little black/yellow tube (I always though this one was black/green, so I didn't make the mental connection when you told me about it) is to provide vacuum sensing information to the EGR valve. Having this tube disconnected would screw up the smog readings on the car, but I do not think it will turn out to have any effect on our starting problem. Sorry.

One thing we still have not investigated that is warm-up related is the temperature sensor and flapper valve that controls whether the air cleaner gets air from the outside world or under the hood.

This is the device that is right up against the fender next to and a little behind the battery. If you look under the main (3") flexduct, you will see a smaller (2") duct that comes from the exhaust manifold area of the engine. Its purpose is to provide warm air during startup when the underhood temp is under 100 degrees.

When the car warms up, this 2" tube should be closed off and the main tube that goes out to the front of the car should be open. If this changeover were not taking place correctly, it is possible that you are not getting sufficient airflow when starting if the car is warm.

I think this is a slim chance, but just to eliminate it as a possible cause, take the 3" ductwork completely off the car, and just let it run without it for testing purposes. This is the duct with the plastic click-down strap clamps on each end, one on the air cleaner "snorkel" as you call it, the other at the flapper valve we discussed above.

Dick Benjamin bondotmec@alphainfo.com

Subject: 1981 Imperial - Running rough

Sent: 3/28/97 6:04 AM

From: lester@cnwl.igs.net (Shawn Thompson)

Just took my car out of the garage after a five month rest It started well, I let it run for about twenty minutes, I was hoping that my problems would've cured itself. Well, no luck.

The roads were clear of snow and nice and dry, so I decided to venture over to see my mechanic once again, I explained how the car was running. After thinking for a couple of minutes, he reached down and unplugged something and ask me to try the car like that.

I made a appointment to have him check it out completely NOW THE GOOD NEWS: my car was running GREAT.

I called him when I got home to let him know. He claims that what he unplugged controls the amount of fuel going to the FI system and that the engine wasn’t getting enough gas.

He told me what this sensor was, but I guess I wasn’t listening. When I take it back to have it replaced, Ill let you know EXACTLY what my problem was.

(RELIEVED) for now - keep up the good work:

Cliff Thompson Ontario Canada

Subject: 81 FI problems

Sent: 3/31/97 8:48 PM

From: bondotmec@alphainfo.com (Dick Benjamin)

Most likely what he unplugged was the oxygen sensor (AKA O2 sensor). This is a thingie that looks sort of like a spark plug, and it is threaded into the left exhaust manifold.

There is a one wire plug dangling from the Air Cleaner electronics unit that plugs into the one wire receptacle on the pigtail from the O2 sensor. These are easy to replace (like a spark plug) and cheap, and easily available from any parts store.

Running without it connected is giving you substandard power and economy, and excessive pollution. If a faulty O2 sensor is all that has caused your problems, you are a very lucky man. Replace it and go back to enjoying your car the way it was meant to run!

Dick Benjamin

Subject: 81 FI problems

Sent: 4/7/97 11:20 AM

From: bondotmec@alphainfo.com (Dick Benjamin)

I think you have proven that the air flow sensor IS working, or else it would not have had such a noticeable effect when you restricted the air intake. In fact, you have led me to believe the real culprit is the fuel flow sensor, which was suggested way back in the beginning of this discussion by Frank C. (and who I have copied with this response). Frank described a method of dealing with the problem which included investigation of the fuel flow sensor, and I remember him making the point that this is a likely cause of your problem, and also that it is much cheaper than the air flow sensor to take care of. You should review his original posting on the subject, it was just after this car and its problems were first discussed. Unfortunately I've had a crash on my system so I do not have the comments Frank made at the time, but he will see this response, and perhaps you can get in touch with him through the IML to obtain his thoughts again. Listen to the man, he knows his stuff.

Good luck, now

Dick Benjamin

Subject: 81 FI problems FF Sensor

Sent: 4/9/97 2:15 AM

From: bmb@zoomnet.net (Brian, Barb and now Dennis)

We will definitely explore the fuel flow sensor as soon as the car can be started again.

What I don't understand is how the AF sensor could be good. If the fuel sensor was feeding too much gas and then we choked the air wouldn't that make it burn even more rich? or would that in effect tell the gas flow sensor to lack off the gas and that is why it temporarily straightened out?

Help me I'm confusing myself with all these possibilities!!! Brian

Subject: 81 FI - Start problems

Sent: 4/9/97 11:19 AM

From: DBaker5197@aol.com

Brian,

First off, you can't tell a sensor ANYTHING! (They are kinda like teenagers) Sensors send signals to the main processor and that is ALL they do. From a strictly operational standpoint, if a sensor is missing or sending a signal that the processor has been programmed to ignore (i.e. a voltage or resistance which is too high or too low) then the processor will substitute a static reference signal in its' place (which is pre-programmed at the manufacturer) which causes the computer to operate in either the "open loop" mode (if the engine has just been started) or the "limp in" or "limp home" mode (if the sensor(s) go bad after warm-up).

If the car will not start at all (either hot or cold) then you have a more basic fuel and/or ignition problem. A basic test for the fuel pump is to park the car in a quiet place and have someone listen at the rear of the car while you turn the ignition to the "ON" position. The listener should hear the electric fuel pump run for approximately one second and then shut off. (Do NOT turn the key to start position).

If this does not happen, then you have a fuel pump/wiring, or auto shut down relay problem, or a blown fuel pump fuse. (Check all of your fuses first, since there may be a fuse blown that supplies power to a portion of the computer) Remember on a fuel injected Chrysler product, the engine control computer is in two separate modules.

The power module is the one under the hood, and the logic module is in the passenger-side kick panel, along with the auto shut down relay and MAP (manifold absolute pressure) sensor (which could also be causing the problem). Also, the coolant temperature sensor (located in the thermostat housing) could be bad. This sensor, when cold, allows the logic module to "demand slightly richer fuel mixtures and higher idle speeds until normal operating temperatures are reached.

The coolant temperature sensor allows the logic module to act like an “automatic choke" (quoted from Chilton's service manual). Basically, you will (assuming that the fuel supply and ignition systems are healthy) have to check all of the sensors in a step by step fashion or lay out a lot of money trying to substitute parts in a hit or miss fashion.

Your best bet would be to call your local public library and see if they have a Chilton Manual (most libraries do) and check it out and use it. If you like it, you can contact them for a copy of the manual covering your model year (they usually cover 4-5 model years in one edition) at the following:

Chilton Book Company Chilton Way Radnor, Pa. 19089

Or go to the parts department of your local Chrysler dealer and get an order form for the factory manual. I do this every time I get another car, and they have been invaluable to me, since I do all of my own service/repair. Good luck and let me know if I can be of further assistance.

Dave

Subject: 81 FI - Start problems

Sent: 4/9/97 7:25 PM

From: bondotmec@alphainfo.com (Dick Benjamin)

Just focus on the fact that your changing the air flow had an obvious effect on the EFI system, or else the result would have disappeared as soon as you removed your hand instead of persisting for a few minutes. The computer must have made an adjustment in response to your restricting the air flow, thus something detected that restriction, it had to be the air flow sensor. (I think).

Reread Frank C's posting about cleaning out the fuel flow sensor, and give that a try. It won't cost you anything, and there is a good chance it will straighten the car out.

Dick Benjamin

Subject: 81 FI problems - FF Sensor
Sent: 4/9/97 7:25 PM

From: bondotmec@alphainfo.com (Dick Benjamin)

Just focus on the fact that your changing the air flow had an obvious effect on the EFI system, or else the result would have disappeared as soon as you removed your hand instead of persisting for a few minutes. The computer must have made an adjustment in response to your restricting the air flow, thus something detected that restriction, it had to be the air flow sensor. (I think).

Reread Frank C's posting about cleaning out the fuel flow sensor, and give that a try. It won't cost you anything, and there is a good chance it will straighten the car out. Dick Benjamin

Subject: 81 FI problems - AFS

Sent: 4/9/97 7:25 PM

From: bondotmec@alphainfo.com (Dick Benjamin)

Just focus on the fact that your changing the air flow had an obvious effect on the EFI system, or else the result would have disappeared as soon as you removed your hand instead of persisting for a few minutes. The computer must
have made an adjustment in response to your restricting the air flow, thus
something detected that restriction, it had to be the air flow sensor. (I
think). Reread Frank C's posting about cleaning out the fuel flow sensor, and
give that a try. It won't cost you anything, and there is a good chance it
will straighten the car out.

Dick Benjamin

Subject: 81 FI - Start problems

Sent: 4/10/97 8:20 PM

From: bmb@zoomnet.net (Brian, Barb and now Dennis)

OK sounds good. we will try it when we get the starter changed. I guess what I
was thinking was the AFS was way out of calibration and that’s why when we
choked it straightened out. but we'll definitely do the FFS thing ASAP. I
should really thank you for all your help on this subject. And everyone else
too THANKS!!!

I read a message that someone had a good GIF or JPEG of the system. Could I
possibly get it?

Do you know how many 81s were produced? The dealer in Huntington that sold the
car said 1000 but I’ve heard more like 4000. Brian

Subject: 81 FI problems - GIF

Sent: 4/11/97 11:19 PM

From: bondotmec@alphainfo.com (Dick Benjamin)

Tony has the GIF files on his web site. There was a posting (by me) as to how
to get them printed out in a useable size about 2 weeks ago. Unfortunately I
have had a disastrous system crash, and I can no longer make a copy for you,
but I think Tony has the info at his fingertips.

Tony's web site also has the production statistics for the three years of the
cars, I believe. If not, bug me and I will repost them.

Dick Benjamin

Subject: 81 FI problems - AFS

Sent: 4/10/97 8:20 PM

From: bmb@zoomnet.net (Brian, Barb and now Dennis)

OK sounds good. We will try it when we get the starter changed. I guess what I
was thinking was the AFS was way out of calibration and that’s why when we
choked it straightened out. but we'll definitely do the FFS thing ASAP.

I should really thank you for all your help on this subject and everyone else
too THANKS!!! I read a message that someone had a good GIF or JPEG of the
system. could I possibly get it? Do you know how many 81s were produced? The
dealer in Huntington that sold the car said 1000 but I’ve heard more like
4000. Brian

Subject: 81 FI problems

From: grad@cts.com (Graduate, Ltd)

I have my 81 FI Imperial up and running well now. I will share what I learned
very soon. I just met a guy named Gary who owns an 81 Imperial FI that just
(80 miles ago) came out of a computerized tune up at a dealership in Anaheim,
CA. named McPeek. He drove the car back to San Diego and it was running great.
Suddenly he has a problem which has stopped him cold. He let the car sit for
awhile and it needed a jump. When he applies the cable it arcs back a him. I
told Gary about the IML and that I would seek the wisdom of the group for him.
Reply to Grad@cts.com

Carl Baty. Thanks folks.

Subject: 81 Overheating

Sent: 4/20/97 11:17 AM

From: lvovski9@idt.net (Brian Liberman)

Hi, I am Brian, live in Libertyville, IL, own 1981 Imp. Some time ago as a
member of IML I received your mail regarding Lou's Garage in Lake Forest.

Today, I am looking for a place to fix my car which suddenly presented me with
the overheating problem. All displays, except battery(VOLT) light which stays
on all the time, went down and antifreeze was shooting from all places and
angles in engine compartment and under the car.

Would you be kind enough to provide few more details about your particular
experience with that place? What kind of car they fixed for you, what was the
problem and how long did it take them to do it. Did they give you a written
estimate in advance? At $56/hour ongoing labor rate and peculiar FI on my '81,
it's highly desirable not to make a mistake in choosing mechanic.

Thanks in advance. lvovski9@mail.idt.net

Subject: 1981 Imperial - Fuel stop valve

Sent: 5/4/97 8:15 PM

From: bondotmec@alphainfo.com (Dick Benjamin)

OK, Shawn I think we're on the same page now.

If you have the shop manual for the car, go to page 8-195 and look at the
components on the driver's side inner fender. About 1/3 of the way from the
hood hinge to the front of the car is the "throttle body switch relay".

This is a metal box of the size you describe, and it has 6 wires going to it.
The wires atwo black wires with a faint pink stripe, three solid black wires,
and one violet wire with a faint black stripe on it. There are actually only 4
contacts used on the relay, two of the 6 wires are paired up with identical
wires in single cavities of the connector to the relay. The connector to the
relay may consist of two separate pieces of plastic with wires crimped to
terminal sockets that mate with the prongs on the relay, or it may be all in
one piece.

To understand the purpose of this relay, you can read about it on page 14-86
of the "engine performance" manual. It is the device described under "Back-up
Circuit for Closed Throttle Switch". In case you don't have these manuals, let
me explain that the purpose of this relay is to retard the timing and enable
the automatic Idle speed motor (to regulate your curb idle) under conditions
that are rather unlikely, namely that the idle stop contact (which does the
same thing) has for some reason failed, and the driver is holding his foot on
the brake pedal. In any event, this will only affect the engine operation at
curb idle, and only if failure has also occurred at the idle stop contact.

You can check this out yourself by pulling the connector off the relay, and
temporarily grounding the violet wire via the exposed end of the terminal
socket in the connector, while the engine is idling. I'll bet you don't notice
any effect. If you do notice an effect, then investigate the violet wire that
plugs on to the contact that is touched by the throttle valve lever (when the
accelerator is released) on the passenger side of the car, near the right
front of the throttle body. You'll have to remove the top part of the air
cleaner to get a good look at this contact. Either the contact is dirty, or
the wire is not plugged in.

Remember, this only affects curb idle, don't waste your time with this if you
are having driveability problems at speeds above idle.

I have forgotten what symptoms you are trying to cure, so I am not sure if
this is germane to your situation.

Dick

Thanks for taking time to help solve my problem, after having my car checked
out, it still isn't running up to par. Carl Baty suggested to check the fuel
stop valve, well, I have to admit that I wouldn't know one if I was holding it
in my hands. After receiving your Email, I checked for a parts number and I
came up with this. 1411576. Does this number sound right? The box which I
checked is roughly 1"x2" and it has four prongs on it. It is located on the
right side under the hood directly over top of the wheel well. Yes, my car is
still EFI. I may have checked the wrong box. You may have guessed, by now,
Dick, that I'm far from being mechanically inclined. If you would take time,
Dick, to check out this number, I'd appreciate it

Subject: 1981 Imperial "symptoms" - EGR

Sent: 5/7/97 8:33 AM

From: bondotmec@alphainfo.com (Dick Benjamin)

Good list, Shawn(or is it Cliff? I just noticed the signature is not Shawn).

One thing that is very suspicious on your list is the EGR valve. This would
cause approximately the symptoms you describe if it were stuck in the "on" or
open position. If the mechanic bypassed it, he probably had the same
suspicion. It is quite possible that even though it is "bypassed", it could
still be allowing exhaust gases into the intake manifold. I would rather he
took it off and cleaned it out (you don't say how many miles are on the car,
but often these things get horribly carboned up, especially if the car is over
100,000 MI.)

He could also apply an external vacuum source to it and verify that it
operates properly. The only thing that concerns me about blaming the EGR valve
is that the car only does it after warming up thoroughly. If the EGR valve was
bad and stuck open, I would have expected it to be that way all the time.

The first thought that occurred to me is that your low speed injection nozzles
don't seem to be working, at least when the car is acting up. If your mechanic
is comfortable with doing it, I would ask him to take the fuel injection rail
assembly off the hydraulic support plate, and carefully disassemble it into
its component parts, which include both a high speed and a low speed (pressure
controlled) fuel valve, a small fuel filter, and four separate little squirt
holes that aim the fuel down into the maw of the throttle body.

The assembly comes out with two screws and disconnection of a fuel line, and
disassembly only involves two additional screws. There are 3 or 4 O-ring
seals, but they are never bad in my experience, and they are available at any
parts store anyway. After a careful and thorough cleaning, your car will
either be fixed, or exactly the same. It won't be any worse (which with these
critters often happens when you try to fix them).

Your need to depress the accelerator to start is telling us that something
isn't kosher with the Automatic Idle Speed system. Verify that the violet wire
(it has a faint black stripe on it) is connected to the switch contact at the
front passenger side corner of the throttle body. Verify that the switch
contact is working properly such that the violet wire is grounded when the car
is at idle. Just for the heck of it, try to start the car with your foot on
the brake.

(This activates a backup system to the idle switch contact we just discussed,
and should produce the same result if it is working, about a 50-50 chance.)
This would also explain your problem with stalling at idle, which these cars
never do if the AIS system is working right. Did you ever happen to notice if
it DOESN'T stall if you have your foot on the brake?

It is also possible, of course that the AIS (throttle positioning) motor has
failed or is unplugged, it is near the switch contact we just discussed, and
it is connected to the throttle linkage via an adjustable link. The motor is
in a gray rectangular metal box about 2 1/2 X 1 X 1 1/2 inches, with an
electrical connector, and it is held to the throttle body with two screws.
These seldom fail, but they often get disconnected when people are fiddling
around with the fuel injection. (There is also a throttle position sensor in
the same area, but this seems to be working OK. It is a round black deally,
with an electrical connection).

Lets take baby steps from here, and see if these suggestions lead to pay dirt.

I am going to copy the IML with both sides of this correspondence, there are a
lot of members interested in these cars, and there are some other very
knowledgeable people in the group also, I may have missed something that they
can add, and others may want to save the info for future trouble shooting.

Dick

Subject: 1981 Imperial "symptoms" - EGR

From: Shawn Thompson <lester@cnwl.igs.net

Good morning Dick:

Thought I'd get back to you to let you know exactly how my car is running. On
a cold start, I have to press the throttle slightly when starting. After
starting, it will run a bit on the rough side until it warms up. It runs well
for about 15 to 20 minutes, then at low speed, lets say, from 0 to 40 km, it
seems to be starving for fuel. After reaching 40 and upwards, it runs well.
When coming to a complete stop, most of the time it will stall. A month back I
thought we had found the problem after taking it in for a complete check-up,
but I guess it was only wishful thinking on my part because it's still running
the same way. Dick, my car is still in mint condition and we'd love to find
out what's causing this problem, so anything you suggest, I willing to try.

I'm listing the parts which I've replaced:

Computer in 1994
Fuel flow meter
Valve seals
Timing chain
Distributor pick-up
Plugs and wires

Now, this is a partial list of things we've checked:

Coolant sensor
Oxygen sensor
Fuel pressure switch

and for some reason we bypassed the EGR valve Well, Dick once again, thanks
for your time and knowledge.
Cliff

Subject: 1981 Imperial Backfires - Adjusting Idle?

Sent: 5/8/97 9:57 AM

From: wes@direct.ca (Wesley T Foulds)

I have a 1981 Imperial with 128 thousand miles on it and want to know how to
adjust the idle on it. It idles too fast.

I also need to know why it backfires. It seems to backfire when it is in
neutral and I push on the gas to rev the engine if any one has info I would be
very happy to hear from them on Imperial mailing list or at my Email
wes@direct.ca

[My request is that we keep all such technical discussions here on the IML, so
I can archive them on the IML's websites for future reference - Tony]

Subject: 1981 Imperial Backfires - Adjusting Idle?

Sent: 5/8/97 5:39 PM

From: DBaker5197@aol.com

Wesley,

Backfiring is a symptom of a mixture which is too rich. (If it's through the
exhaust and not through the throttle body. If through the throttle body, then
your mixture is too lean, you've jumped a tooth on the valve timing, which is
a possibility with a high miler, or your base ignition timing is WAY too far
advanced, which would also cause the car to idle too fast) I don't have my
service manual handy but I don't believe that the idle speed has a screwdriver
adjustment. The AIS motor controls a small air valve, which is just like
pulling a vacuum hose off. The speed picks up, but the engine doesn't go rough
because the computer increases the fuel flow. Try checking out the O2 sensor
in the exhaust manifold. It will be a relatively cheap and easy fix. Good
Luck. Dave

Subject: 1981 Imperial Backfires - Adjusting Idle?

Sent: 5/9/97 7:52 AM

From: bondotmec@alphainfo.com (Dick Benjamin)

Wesley;

Is your car still EFI, or has it been converted to carburetor? The answers to
your questions depend on knowing this. If you are not sure, look to see if it
has a fuel pump mounted to the front passenger side of the engine under the
Air conditioner compressor. It will have fuel lines going up under the air
cleaner from this location rather than up the right rear of the block, which
is where they are for the EFI system.

Dick Benjamin

From: wes@direct.ca (Wesley T Foulds)
To: ImperialML@aol.com

I have a 1981 Imperial with 128 thousand miles on it and want to know how to
adjust the idle on it. It idles too fast. I also need to know why it
backfires. It seems to backfire when it is in neutral and I push on the gas to
rev the engine if any one has info I would be very happy to hear from them on
Imperial mailing list or at my Email wes@direct.ca

Subject: 1981 Imperial Backfires - Adjusting Idle?

Sent: 5/9/97 8:32 PM

From: bondotmec@alphainfo.com (Dick Benjamin)

Just for accuracy, the AIS system adjusts the throttle butterfly position in
response to control signals from the CCC to maintain a constant idle speed on
the EFI system. Vacuum leaks, AC clutch cycling, dropping it into gear, time
of the month, tidal waves, altitude, attitude, temperature, phase of the moon
etc. have no effect on the idle speed (other than a brief transient) if the
CCC is working properly.

If the car has been converted, Dave's comment is probably correct, I have no
experience with converted cars in this area (even though I own one, I have so
far managed to ignore it.) With a carbureted car of any stripe, however,
another and very common cause of a "backfire" through the exhaust system is an
intermittent spark to one or more cylinders. (Remember guys, when we were
teenagers, how we got the girls walking down the street to notice us???)

Dick Benjamin

Subject: 1981 Imperial Backfires - Adjusting Idle?

Sent: 5/12/97 8:02 PM

From: fc3@bellatlantic.net (Frank Cannavale, III)

Don't forget the obvious:

Check the ignition timing is to spec.

Check that the distributor mechanical advance is OK, springs and weights
attached

Check that the timing chain is not too worn and allowing the timing to "walk"

-- Frank Cannavale, III fc3@bellatlantic.net http://nj5.injersey.com/~fc3

Subject: 1981 Imperial Backfires - Adjusting Idle?

Sent: 5/14/97 4:56 PM

From: CUDAIZE@aol.com

I have also heard that it could be as simple as gapping the spark plugs
correctly.

I know of at least one car that a guy sold because he couldn't get it to run
properly and the new owner took it to his mechanic and all he did was gap the
plugs properly.

The guy who got rid of the car felt pretty bad, needless to say.

Mike Afflerbach

Subject: EFI parts FI

Sent: 5/28/97 3:19 PM

From: jguarino@pangea.ca (jeff guarino)

Hi Jeff. I currently have 2 FS models 1982 and 2 others but only one with fuel
injection.

I may be able to help you out with some of your electrical problems. I'll get
out my manual and take a look.

In the meantime you mentioned a bunch of nonfunctional fuel injection parts. I
would be interested in knowing what you have exactly and what you would want
to sell it for. I may be able to salvage something. I currently have a set of
nonworking parts and have some knowledge of electronics so I might be able to
make use of the parts to restore one of my FS models. I'll get back to you
with some suggestions about your electrical problems.

later Jeff Guarino

Subject: 1981-83 ASDM, Analysis, EFI

Sent: 8/13/97 9:50 AM

From: Greg.Campbell@GAT.COM (Greg Campbell)

Tony and all,

Thanks to Dick Benjamin, Jeff Guarino, Bob Harris, Mike Bleznyk and Frank
Cannavale for schematics and analysis of the EFI system.

When I bought my '82, the control pump would run at full speed all the time
during crank and run. It was undrivable needless to say. A mechanic took the
air cleaner cover loose (unknowingly disabling the mass flow sensor too) and
just told me to CRANK IT! Quite a ball of fire came out and singed his hair. I
was in such a hurry to drive the car that I just told him to fix it. He
replaced the entire hydraulic plate, electronics included, for (only!) $1600.

I could have waited until I got the shop manuals, at which time I gained an
understanding of the system such that I could do some intelligent diagnosis. I
still keep the old hydraulic plate in case any mechanical parts wear out. I
bet with those schematics I can find the component that allows that pump to
run full speed.

I am an EE after all! I've even thought about taking one of those cheap single
board industrial microcontroller or digital signal processor demo units and
redoing the whole thing. It would be a fun project but I guess the EPA and
CARB would have a cow.

[Still, I think it would be a worthy project - It sounds like we have another
top-quality 1980's Imperial expert on our team! - Tony]

Greg ('60, '67, '82)

Subject: 1981-83 ASDM, Analysis, EFI

Sent: 8/13/97 4:59 PM

From: Imperial@utkux.utcc.utk.edu (Elijah Scott)

I don't own an '81-'83 Imperial (well, not yet anyway), but I've always been
fascinated by them, and especially the electronic fuel injection.

And I must say that I am just impressed all to hell by the work done by our
crew on this topic. It's really great to be part of a group of such ingenious
and intelligent people. In less than a year, these guys have managed to get
together and investigate and solve problems that Chrysler Corporation was
never able or willing to deal with. Wowsers!

Elijah

Subject: 1981-83 ASDM, Analysis, EFI

Sent: 8/16/97 9:58 PM

From: bondotmec@alphainfo.com (Dick Benjamin)

been fascinated by them, and especially the electronic fuel injection. solve
problems that Chrysler Corporation was never able or willing to deal with.

Well, speaking for myself, the posies are nice, and thank you.

But I feel that what we are doing is largely revisiting most of the fixes that
the better Chrysler service reps must have figured out when the cars were new
or nearly new. Bob Harris has remained close to the Chrysler crew, and is
providing a lot of insight into some of the things they have done to try to
make these cars more reliable. I think they never really cured all the
problems, thus the official recommendation to convert to conventional
carburetion (at the owner's cost!).

We still need to get access to the schematics for the CCC/ESA unit, the whiz-
bang dash electronics, and the EFI portion of the Combustion Control Computer.
We may have to do the same on those items (disassembly, depotting, and
painstaking circuit tracing work) that Jeff Gaurino did to produce the
information we have on the power module and the Automatic Shutdown Module.

The cars are definitely worth preserving in their original form, both because
they are a delight to drive when everything is right, and for historical
honesty.

Dick Benjamin bondotmec@alphainfo.com

Subject: 1981-83 ASDM, Analysis, EFI

Sent: 8/17/97 5:05 PM

From: Greg.Campbell@GAT.COM (Greg Campbell)

When I bought my '82, the control pump would run at full speed all the time
fix it. He replaced the entire hydraulic plate, electronics included, for
(only!) $1600.

I bet with those schematics I can find the component that allows that pump to
run full speed. I am an EE after all! I've even thought about taking one of
those cheap single board industrial microcontroller or digital signal
processor demo units and redoing the whole thing. It would be a fun project
but I guess the EPA and CARB would have a cow.

From: bondotmec@alphainfo.com (Dick Benjamin)

Greg:

You certainly can figure out what would cause the control pump to run full
time. Most likely the output PNP punched through and clamped the control pump
drive signal to 12 volts. Of course it could have been a failure of one of the
previous stages in the power module, but in any case it would be child's play
for an EE with the schematic to track it down.

Have you downloaded the schematics from the web site yet? Take a look at them,
if you have, and tell me what you think of the circuit surrounding Q52. We are
not sure what kind of device it is, the board is labeled A, G, and C, which we
now think probably means anode, gate and cathode, but we are (so far) in the
dark as to what the electrical characteristics of this critter are. (I retired
in 1979, and was really out of direct responsibility for circuit design for 10
years before that, so by this time I am really out of touch with semiconductor
technology.)

There are a couple of really minor errors on the schematics, we will update
them when we feel we have tracked down all the facts. I do not think the
errors will bother you, but if you see something you are puzzled about,
contact either me or Jeff Gaurino, who really did the lion's share of the
work.

So glad to have another EE to talk to about this critter.

I will copy the other guys who have been following these discussions, please
join us and throw in any thoughts you care to. If you would like copies of our
previous discussions, let me know and I will dig out a set and sent them to
you.

Dick Benjamin bondotmec@alphainfo.com

Subject: 81 / 83 EFI Imperials - Some Service Info

Sent: 8/17/97 11:19 AM

From: HarrisWerks@worldnet.att.net (Robert J. Harris)

Dick,

Read your latest - here's some info, that is general in nature, but applicable
to all 318 and 360 LA block engines.

The intake manifolds are prone to leak air at the rear, horizontal flange
area, in front of the distributor mounting. A tube of RTV Sealer, Mopar part
4026070 and part 4105671 will repair that manifold leak see Service Bulletin
09-04-82 for details. It is NOT necessary to remove the manifold to effect the
change.

For the small piping details in the fuel system within the Support Plate there
is a note about avoiding fuel leaks - this is the new Pressure Switch TSB -
and in essence it states that you should use Locktite 290 on the threaded ends
of the fasteners of each respective joint that you may have disassembled and
this will prevent any future fuel leakage. This stuff is available at many
places. Too bad, the Pressure Switch is NOT available from Chrysler.

Bob Harris

[I'm getting goose-pimples! This is so cool, to have such wise folks sharing
such useful tips - It's unprecedented in the hobby! - Tony]

Subject: 81 / 83 EFI Imperials - Some Service Info

Sent: 8/20/97 7:23 AM

From: bondotmec@alphainfo.com (Dick Benjamin)

From: HarrisWerks@worldnet.att.net (Robert J. Harris)

Bob wrote:

Dick,

The intake manifolds are prone to leak air at the rear, horizontal flange
area, in front of the distributor mounting.

Bob;

I saw all the discussion in the service manual leaks at this point, and the
use of the anaerobic and RTV sealers, and did follow the procedures described.
What intrigues me about your posting is the mention that the leak would be an
air leak! I always assumed that the leaks that were problematical were oil
leaks, and the consequences were merely cosmetic.

Now I am wondering if this could some way be a cause of my mysterious low
speed idle problems. I'm not sure how air could get into the intake passages
through this (failed) seal, however. Do you understand it?

there is a note about avoiding fuel leaks - and in essence it states that you
should use Locktite 290 on the threaded ends of the fasteners of each
respective joint

One of the cars had Locktite on the threads, I forget if it was the one that
leaked later or not, I had them both apart so many times! But the one with
Locktite was a bear to get apart! I had to remove the whole fuel rail assembly
to the bench vise to avoid scarring up the fittings on the little curlicue
line, my Snap-On line wrench was rounding off the corners!.

When I put them back together, I did not use any sealer, but I did have to
check and retighten the fittings a couple of times. As you no doubt know, you
can make the control pump put out its maximum pressure (about 80 PSI!) by
disconnecting the FPS and powering the S5 18TN wire from the starter relay
directly from the battery. Sure get a good look at the 8 spray patterns that
way, and find any leaks.

Thanks for the tips, I'll be out looking at the back of that intake manifold!

Dick Benjamin

Subject: 81 / 83 EFI Imperials - Some Service Info

Sent: 8/21/97 12:09 PM

From: fc3@bellatlantic.net (Frank Cannavale, III)

The intake manifolds are prone to leak air at the rear, horizontal flange
area, in front of the distributor mounting. A tube of RTV Sealer, Mopar part
4026070 and part 4105671 will repair that manifold leak see Service Bulletin
09-04-82 for details. It is NOT necessary to remove the manifold to effect the
change.

Wait a minute, there! Are you suggesting that the intake manifold can develop
a leak at the rear of the manifold so that extra air enters the manifold, such
that the air-fuel mixture is substantially leaned out?

If so, I think I know what is wrong with my '83!

Frank Cannavale, III fc3@bellatlantic.net

Subject: 81 / 83 EFI Imperials - Some Service Info

Sent: 8/22/97 12:26 PM

From: HarrisWerks@worldnet.att.net (Robert J. Harris)

Wait a minute, there! Are you suggesting that the intake manifold can develop
a leak at the rear of the manifold so that extra air enters the manifold, such
that the air-fuel mixture is substantially leaned out?

If so, I think I know what is wrong with my '83!

Frank,

What I suggested to Dick was that it is possible to have the intake manifold -
head interface leak under the manifold rather than on the top be even more
pronounced if there were an air leak, in addition, at the Manifold/Block. The
PCV system would enhance such a leak since it pulls air from this internal
cavity.

If the gasket interface on the underside, (Manifold/Head), is not tight, then
you could indeed have this problem - which is certainly not limited to these
EFI cars by any means. What is peculiar about Dicks' car is that he feels that
the problem is located in the center of the engine, but moreover, on both
sides. This doesn't sound right, but he's about to remove the manifold again.

It should be remembered that a manifold flange leak, such as we are
discussing, could indeed disrupt the mix ratio because the PCV system is now
drawing air from an additional area - the atmosphere - and this could change
the intended allowable mixture ratio. An additional gasket leak at the
Manifold/Block area would be more detrimental than a defective PCV system
because the cylinder vacuum is not limited by the spring loaded PCV valve. The
PCV valve hose connects to a cavity on the Throttle Body, which is in the
center, but I feel that I'm getting far afield from the real problem and
speculating.

I'd like to know more about your problem.

Bob Harris

Subject: 81 FI Problem with Stalling

Sent: 8/30/97 12:16 AM

From: grad@cts.com (Graduate, Ltd)

I need some advice in curing a problem that has thrown me. About two months
ago my 81 w/ intact FI started stalling during the warm up period. I am
defining the warm up period to be about 15 minutes. She starts every morning
beautifully and then will stall, usually three times, before she starts
running consistently. I have hard wired the fuel shut off module ground. I
have installed a new in tank fuel pump.

I have replaced the fuel filters. I have re-calibrated the computer. I have
checked the back pressure on the converter.

I need suggestions on what to try next. She will stall on freeways at 65 mph,
or at idle, or at a restarts after she cools off some, but she always starts
perfectly the first time in the morning and she runs consistently after the
first 15-20 minutes and at least 3 stalls in that time period.

Looking forward to your responses.
Carl Baty, San Diego.
Subject: 81 FI Problem with Stalling

Sent: 8/31/97 4:09 AM

From: STUDELICHP@aol.com

I have a similar problem at startup and have been unable to find the problem.
I also had the high speed problem but was able to fix that by changing the
sensors on the engine. You know map, oxygen etc. Didn't cost a lot and they
need to be replaced every 50K anyway and I did not do that.

Let me know if you find out what the other problem is mine only started when I
retired mine from everyday to weekend use only.

Subject: 81 FI Problem with Stalling

Sent: 9/1/97 6:42 PM

From: HarrisWerks@worldnet.att.net (Robert J. Harris)

I need some advice in curing a problem that has thrown me. About two months
ago my 81 w/ intact FI started stalling during the warm up period. I am
defining the warm up period to be about 15 minutes. She starts every morning
beautifully and then will stall, usually three times, before she starts
running consistently. I have hard wired the fuel shut off module ground. I
have installed a new in tank fuel pump.

I have replaced the fuel filters. I have re-calibrated the computer. I have
checked the back pressure on the converter.

I need suggestions on what to try next. She will stall on freeways at 65 mph,
or at idle, or at a restarts after she cools off some, but she always starts
perfectly the first time in the morning and she runs consistently after the
first 15-20 minutes and at least 3 stalls in that time period.

Hello Carl,

I have experienced your problems some years ago and will pass on to you some
ideas to stop the problem. My problems always occurred after some warm-up
period. Upon cooling, it would usually restart.

It is my opinion that the fault is Ignition rather than Fuel. During warm-up,
when it stops, remove the Air Cleaner Cover and have someone go through the
Start cycle, you should see some fuel squirting from the Spray Bars. It's a
good idea to have grounded the secondary wire from the coil to the distributor
prior to Start. Two tries may be necessary to get the fuel to spray. Recycle
the Ignition key to Off, then repeat. If you get the fuel, proceed to Ignition
tests.

Remove the 10 Way connector from the rear of the Computer, and connect an
ohmmeter between connector terminals 5 and 9; you should read 150 to 900 ohms.
If yes, connect one ohmmeter connector to a good ground, the other to
connectors 5 and 9 alternately; there should be no continuity; if there is,
disconnect the Pick-Up Coil connector at the Distributor and connect one lead
of the ohmmeter to ground, the other to each terminal, on the Distributor end
of the connector, there should be no continuity. If there is no continuity,
check the wire from the Computer to the Pick-Up Coil for a short to ground,
this may be an intermittent thing, so carefully trace the path and look for
abraded insulation on this wire. If there is continuity, replace the Pick-Up
coil.

Because you cannot predict when this fault will occur, I have been able to
warm the Pick-Up coil with a hair dryer, while the ohmmeter is connected to
the two wires, and in less than ten minutes, under mild warming, the ohmmeter
will open and this will indicate that there is a problem within the Pick-Up
Coil - replace it. There were a bunch of 81's with this problem and it was due
to a bad production run of these coils.

By the way, where did you get the new In-Tank Fuel Pump?

Let us know how you're doing.

Bob Harris

Subject: Sluggish '81?

Sent: 9/7/97 8:31 AM

From: Imperial@utkux.utcc.utk.edu (Elijah Scott)

On Friday, I was driving along and saw a bright flash of big red fin --
naturally, I followed it.

The result was that I met a guy who lives a couple of miles from me who's a
big Mopar enthusiast. The big red fin I saw fit onto a '58 300D convertible,
replete with tan leather interior. I followed the owner back to his warehouse,
which had about 15 or so cars, including a '59 Plymouth Fury convertible, a
'74 'Cuda convertible, and a bunch of other fun cars.

This gentleman also owns an '81 Imperial. He said that he really likes the
car, but he can't find anyone locally who can work on it. His current problem
is that the car is just very sluggish. He said that he initially thought the
catalytic converter was clogged, but he had it replaced with no resulting
improvement.

Can anyone offer some suggestions here? The gentleman does not have e-mail, so
he cannot participate directly with our club, but I don't mind relaying
messages. I'm sure he would also be willing to contact people by phone.

Thanks!

Elijah

Subject: Sluggish '81?

Sent: 9/8/97 11:39 PM

From: bondotmec@alphainfo.com (Dick Benjamin)

Elijah;

I guess question #1 is, is the car still EFI, or is it carbureted, and if it
has been converted to carburetor, was it the factory conversion or a backyard
job?

If it is an EFI car, it should never be sluggish! See if you can get more
definition of what he means, for example, missing? Flat spot? How about
variations from cold to hot?

First step on ANY car with driveability problems is to replace the plugs
(AL945 or RN13LYC, gapped at 0.035-0.040" for an EFI car), wires, cap and
rotor.

Next, make sure the air filter is clean, when in doubt, look through it at the
sun, if you can see light through it is OK.

Next, Unless it has been done in the last few thousand miles, I would replace
the O2 sensor. They are supposed to last 50,000 miles, but if the car has been
run with a miss, or on the wrong gas, or with the wrong gasket compound, it
could be contaminated. Usually, the driveability impact of a bad O2 sensor is
small, however.

On an EFI car, it is important that the 8 fuel nozzles are atomizing the fuel
properly. This can be checked on the car, but it might just be easier to take
them off and clean them with a good spray can carburetor cleaner.

After taking off the air cleaner upper section, the fuel nozzles are removed
by disconnecting one fuel line and unscrewing two Phillips screws - it’s not
rocket science. The nozzle assembly has to be taken apart (two more Phillips
screws), but if he has an affinity for mechanical repair, he can do it without
a problem.

It is also imperative with these cars that all vacuum hoses and electrical
connections are clean and tight, especially those inside the air cleaner assy.
If all of that is shipshape, I would put a timing light on it. It should be at
12 BTC at idle.

Has he done a compression check? How many miles on it? Does it still have the
original exhaust system and smog equipment? There are many opportunities to
screw these up by playing around with the original design.

There are 4 or 5 people on the IML who really know these cars, if he wants to
fix it, we'll help.

Dick Benjamin bondotmec@alphainfo.com

Subject: Sluggish '81?

Sent: Monday, September 08, 1997 6:19 PM

Sent: 9/7/97 8:31 AM

From: Imperial@utkux.utcc.utk.edu (Elijah Scott)

On Friday, I was driving along and saw a bright flash of big red fin --
naturally, I followed it.

The result was that I met a guy who lives a couple of miles from me who's a
big Mopar enthusiast. The big red fin I saw fit onto a '58 300D convertible,
replete with tan leather interior. I followed the owner back to his warehouse,
which had about 15 or so cars, including a '59 Plymouth Fury convertible, a
'74 'Cuda convertible, and a bunch of other fun cars.

This gentleman also owns an '81 Imperial. He said that he really likes the
car, but he can't find anyone locally who can work on it. His current problem
is that the car is just very sluggish. He said that he initially thought the
catalytic converter was clogged, but he had it replaced with no resulting
improvement.

Can anyone offer some suggestions here? The gentleman does not have e-mail, so
he cannot participate directly with our club, but I don't mind relaying
messages. I'm sure he would also be willing to contact people by phone.

Thanks!
Elijah

Subject: Sluggish '81?

Sent: 9/11/97 1:41 AM

From: Imperial@utkux.utcc.utk.edu (Elijah Scott)

I guess question # 1 is, is the car still EFI, or is it carbureted, and if it
has been converted to carburetor, was it the factory conversion or a backyard
job?

If it is an EFI car, it should never be sluggish! See if you can get more
definition of what he means, for example, missing? Flat spot? How about
variations from cold to hot?

I do know that this car does have the original EFI system. I've tried to call
the guy to give him the information you provided, as well as to get a more
detailed diagnosis of his problems. I'll post what I find out...

Thanks for the help!

Elijah

Subject: 81-83 problems listed/Let's finish the EFI pages!

Sent: 9/16/97 6:50 AM

From: TZRX85A@prodigy.com (PATRICK J LE)

OK; there's a few specifics...

1. New battery and starter, new resistors (on the firewall).

2. Extremely difficult starting. Didn't even turn over last time I tried! (I
do get the 'click' of the solenoid activating.) If it does turn over, engine
doesn't fire. Sometimes takes up to 1/2 hour to get it to actually catch and
run.

The original carb has an electronic module that was fried. I got hold of a
replacement carb (complete, used) off an 82 that someone had converted to a
standard carb. Put this one in and had the same problems, although not as bad.
The module was fairly intact when I got the replacement carb, but after a
couple of weeks, it started to fry (melt). So I think I've got some kind of
electrical problem, in addition to a fuel flow problem (probably tied
together!!) I also got the complete wiring harness with the replacement carb,
which I swapped in; didn't seem to help matters any. So there ya' go!!

Frustrating?? You bet!! Did I go searching for live hand grenades?? Yes!! Do I
still have the car?? Of course!! It's like an old dog you just don't want to
get rid of!! When it did run, the ride was very smooth and pleasurable. So I
guess, like anything, there are 'trade offs'...

I did go to the Web page to search for the answers, but the link to the EFI
section didn't work. Also, the link to Doug Crowder's (?) Web site (something
like 'fourtyfour.com') also came up as invalid. Don't know that he's still
with his ISP.

[Yeah, I need to yank that reference. The EFI web-pages are at a dead
standstill because we have TOO MUCH information for me to process alone - The
past discussions need to be broken into separate threads, and I'm simply not
qualified, since I don't know the topic very well. All we need is some text-
editing skills and somebody with some time! - Tony]

As far as personal data, I'm still in Tujunga, CA (just outside of Glendale,
in the LA area); my wife and I are moving to the San Francisco Bay Area in
about 3 or 4 months; this necessitates getting the ol' Imperial off the ground
and back among the land of the living.

Any help I can get from ANYONE will be greatly appreciated! (So all you EFI
'gurus', how 'bout some tips?)

Pat tzrx85a@prodigy,com

Subject: 81-83 Carb Fix/WHERE? Re Imperial 81-83

Sent: 9/15/97 3:56 AM

From: SAMDNEW@aol.com

I have found a local in Baton Rouge, LA who has a cheap fix for the EFI
system.

EMail SAMDNEW @ aol

My 82 sat up for 2 years with no parts or kits. Darrell Bacon can adapt a
Plymouth carb. to the system and everything works with original equipment
except the computed mpg.

Subject: 81 w/ FI stalls during warm up

Sent: 9/16/97 7:57 PM

grad@cts.com

From: bondotmec@alphainfo.com (Dick Benjamin)

OK, Carl.

I did not recall seeing your earlier post on the subject, I would have
responded if I had.

Not that I have any brilliant ideas, though.

Grounding the Automatic Shutdown Module is the right move, and is recommended
to anyone with an EFI car. The ASM aka ASDM (which you are calling the fuel
shut off valve) is actually a quite sensitive logic circuit which decides
based on numerous sensor and condition inputs whether or not to allow the EFI
system to have the power it needs to operate. Thus bypassing the power to just
the in-tank pump will not cure the problem if this circuit is screwing up,
because it will still shut the car off even though you have kept the in-tank
pump alive with a bypass. Once this occurs, the key must be cycled to off and
back to start to reinitialize the system.

Your symptoms are still consistent with a poor ground at the ASDM, and I would
first verify that the ground wire is securely connected, and is of least #14
Gauge. It should go to the engine ground either at the alternator bracket or
to the master ground point at the rear of the intake manifold on the passenger
side (there are two braided ground straps there already.) It is also a good
idea to isolate the ASDM electrically from the fender where it is screwed
down, by arranging some rubber grommets or the like and preventing metal to
metal contact via the bracket or the screws.

The reason for this is the ASDM circuit is hair trigger, and due to a
surprisingly amateurish error, was not protected from random noise spikes
which could occur even due to static discharge.

Assuming this has all been done, the next area for investigation is any ground
connection elsewhere in the system. Be sure not to overlook the grounded
terminal inside the Hydraulic Support Assembly (under the air cleaner housing,
next to the right front mounting bolt that come up from the throttle body
through the HSA.) While you are at it, disconnect and clean with contact
cleaner (Radio Shack is a source) all the connectors in the system. There are
4 on the air cleaner assembly, one on the HSA, one on the ASDM, two large ones
in the main harness under the heater control valve. Check the connections to
the EFI coolant sensor (next to the water outlet from the intake manifold to
the radiator upper hose) and to the components mounted on the firewall.

Verify that all the vacuum hoses are in good shape, and properly routed. There
is a diagram on the left inner fender just under the speedometer cable sender
module in front of the left hood hinge. Verify that the air cleaner lid is
well sealed and tightly fastened.

The fact that this seems to be related to the warm up period, brings to mind
that it is possible that the air switching timer is somehow causing the
problem, although it is hard to see how it would cause a shutdown. If the
above steps do not cure this problem, we'll pursue bypassing the various smog
devices including the air switching system to see if there is any improvement.
This is not likely, and I wouldn't suggest going in that direction unless all
the more common problems are eliminated.

It is possible that your ASDM is defective, but I rather doubt it. If you have
already gotten a replacement, by all means try it, but I would save your money
otherwise, until we prove it is the culprit. If you start on an Easter Egg
hunt hoping to stumble on the offending part, you will waste a lot of money,
and possibly never figure out what was really wrong.

A quite likely culprit is the pickup coil in the distributor. If you are
fairly handy with tools, this is not a difficult or expensive item to change.
You will need a feeler gauge in addition to common hand tools, but if you
carefully mark the position of the rotor and the distributor body before you
disturb it, you can get by without a timing light.

I am interested in your mention of a fuel pressure gauge. I take it this is
something someone has added to the car? If so, what point in the system is
monitored, and what is the usual reading?

I know you will get other suggestions from the members of the IML, I hope one
of us can make it go away for you. Keep us posted, and good luck (you'll need
it!).

bondotmec@alphainfo.com

Subject: 81 w/ FI stalls during warm up

Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 1997 2:38 PM

From: Graduate, Ltd <grad@cts.com

I wrote on 29 Aug asking for suggestions. Now I am begging for help and ideas.
I don't know what to do next.

I am still fighting a stalling problem with my 1981 Imperial. Most of the fuel
injection system was replaced when the car had about 73,000 miles on it. The
car still did not run consistently and the owner let the car sit from 1987
until I bought it 18 months ago. I have added 13,000 miles since then. The
basic problem the car had with the erratic running was fixed by cleaning the
ground to the fuel shut off valve (located high on the right front fender
wall). I did not have the heart to tell him. Recently I hard wired the ground
to the fuel shut off valve and I recommend this to anyone with fuel flow
problems, particularly in starting.

My stalling problem started about 4 months ago. The first morning start is
always clean and then during the next 15-20 minutes the engine quits, usually
3 times, at any RPM (freeways included) but never during acceleration. It
starts again without problem. After the 3 stalls the car runs well until I let
it sit for a time and it cools off. The next start is then again followed by 3
stalls within the first 15-20 minutes. Typically, this partially cold start is
followed by stalls within seconds of the start although a stall 15 minutes
later is still possible.

I have by-passed the fuel shut off valve so the current ran directly to the
in- tank pump and it still stalls. When wired directly to the in-tank fuel
pump I was getting normal fuel pressure even when the car stalled. In stalls
with the fuel shut off valve hooked up I registered zero fuel pressure. On
freeways I watched the fuel pressure gauge and when it fell like a rock I
began the restart so quickly that I didn't lose speed. Tomorrow I will replace
the fuel shut off valve although I know it is not the source of the stalling
problem. I have replaced the in-tank pump and fuel filters. I have re-
calibrated the computer and hard wired the ground on the fuel shut off valve.

Now I will sit back and wait for the those more enlightened to come to the
rescue. Thanks in advance.

Carl Baty, San Diego

Subject: 81-83 problems listed/Let's finish the EFI pages!

Sent: 9/17/97 6:03 AM

From: bondotmec@alphainfo.com (Dick Benjamin)

Patrick;

I never saw the previous messages regarding your problems, I have been away a
bit the last few weeks, sorry. Let me get myself on board here and maybe I can
help some.

bondotmec@alphainfo.com

OK; there's a few specifics... 1. New battery and starter, new resistors (on
the firewall). 2. Extremely difficult starting. Didn't even turn over last
time I tried! (I do get the 'click' of the solenoid activating.)

This does not sound like an EFI related problem, unless we have an hydrostatic
lock problem here. What do you do to get it to turn over?

If it does turn over, engine doesn't fire.

Sometimes takes up to 1/2 hour to get it to actually catch and run.

This is quite likely a failure of the fuel system to prime the pump in the HSA
and to purge the vapor from the lines. Next time you can bring this symptom
about, try putting about 1 ounce of fuel in the depression in the center of
the air cleaner lid before you try to start the car. Loosen the wing nut long
enough to let the fuel drain down the center screw threads, then retighten it
and try to start the car. If it starts immediately, we know where to look
next. Let’s not jump the gun, though. Try this test and let me know.

Of course, you mean to say throttle body injection unit, or Hydraulic Support
Assembly (HSA for short). I don't mean to nit-pick, but we don't want to
confuse the rest of the readers.

The original carb has an electronic module that was fried. I got hold of a
replacement carb (complete, used) off an 82 that someone had converted to a
standard carb. Put this one in and had the same problems, although not as bad.
The module was fairly intact when I got the replacement carb, but after a
couple of weeks, it started to fry (melt). So I think I've got some kind of
electrical problem, in addition to a fuel flow problem (probably tied
together!!) I also got the complete wiring harness with the replacement carb,
which I swapped in; didn't seem to help matters any.

I think what you are probably seeing is the running out of the potting
compound from the electronic modules. This happens to all the early production
modules, and does not affect the operation dramatically, as long as it has not
run down into the throttle valves and gummed up the butterflies.

The EFI web-pages are at a dead standstill because we have TOO MUCH
information for me to process alone -

Tony, all I can do is apologize. I have been saving all the threads since the
beginning of time, and I just seem to be too intimidated to start on what I
agreed to do for you. Perhaps when I am more confident of my ability to do the
work, I will get going on it again. In the meantime, I am happy to take over
personally to field all the EFI questions, at least to direct them to the
right guy to answer them. We have 4 or 5 guys who are very willing and able to
help, and I am trying to keep them from repetitive tasks by fielding the
questions myself so far as I am able. I know this is taking more time than it
would take me to do it right, I just need to get some time ahead so I can look
at the task again. I am sorry to let you down.

bondotmec@alphainfo.com

Subject: 81 w/ FI stalls during warm up

Sent: 9/17/97 8:12 AM

From: bondotmec@alphainfo.com (Dick Benjamin)

Carl, I reviewed the traffic from the IML during my inattentive period and I
do now see your earlier posting of your problem.

I see that at that time, Bob Harris also suggested you look at the distributor
pickup coil, and gave some suggestions for diagnosing it and perhaps prodding
it to fail for you with a hair dryer. If you have access to a VOM, why don't
you try his suggestions also, in addition to the others you will receive.

If you do not have the equipment, the pickup coil is cheap, readil